It looks Rudd is in a bit of a pickle at the moment, but don't worry that pickle is still hot, green and juicy and very very ripe. What I mean is that, this pickle is representative of a very exciting moment for the same sex equality rights agenda - what we are seeing occurring at the moment, as The Australian puts it, is:
"...one of the most contentious social policy debates since Roe v Wade, the landmark US Supreme Court ruling that legalised abortion." Which is HUGE for (potential) Australian Equality and puts much pressure on the PM to make future altering decisions!!!
...the social policy debate issue centres around The ACT Governments Civil Partnerships Bill : The wonderful piece of legislation that, in a manner of screaming happily but completely uncontrollably, has potential to give legal recognition to same-sex relationships(YAY).
(Oh, sorry....I just realised that read like a voice over on a cheap video game: the epic quest....the battle...the journey...(Its all out of my system now!!-Even if all of these words and phrases are relevant to the plight for equality).
...Back to the 'plight'(
lol)....Although Rudd has indicated Labor does not allow plans for marriage in a bid to secure and maintain the christian vote (which I have to admit is still a wee bit disappointing-See: "
No Plans to allow gay marriage"), he has indicated, to date, that a national relationships register is a positive and productive way to formally recognise same-sex relationships!!! - See "
Labor to introduce gay couple register".
Both articles also report that secret plans are in the works to allow civil unions--one can only hope. It is disappointing enough that loving same sex relationships are placed on the same level as carers and others in dependent relationships (the idea, according to Labor, is to trial a national model, modelled after The Tasmanian relationship register, for gay and
de facto heterosexual couples)....just to use as added proof of entitlements(although disappointing it is a step in the right direction....).
However the Australian Christian Lobby has accepted this but remains concerned(HA! Poor things concern is best placed elsewhere!)...about potential redefinition of words such as "
de facto" or "family" that might result from future changes to legislation.
(Jumping on the high horse).
As a gay christian I am disappointed, I have and know many loving families that come in all shapes and sizes and family is a contextual term that the christian party and some in society believe have some right to trademark according to their belief.....What this does is decide that some people in society should be left out or excluded from being a family or are not worthy of being called a loving 'family.' This then excludes them further by being outside 'social norms', established in politics, pushing them and their families further away into inequality - I think someone, somewhere along the way, missed the boat actually...this is surely NOT what God would have wanted......)
(Jumping back off the horse-still not happy though!!)
But moving right along(I might not finish this post otherwise).....On a happier note(and finishing on a rant in the spirit of a Christian holiday tradition) this is the last post, pre Xmas(unless those secret plans come to light then I will be back typing furiously :).....
Have a
Merry Xmas all!!!(I love this pics they are
sooo cute!!!) Belief is a big part of Xmas, and so it is a HUGE part of change.
Above: Both by Powerbooktrance @ Flickr